|
The College seeks to improve its undergraduate programs through orderly review of its curriculum. In addition to internal curriculum planning and revision processes, state mandated standards shape curriculum in both the core curriculum and the majors. Moreover, since many new faculty have been hired in recent years, there is energy and interest in curricular changes both within and between disciplines. Many departments are updating their course descriptions and certain majors plan to enhance their programs by requiring a capstone educational experience for students in their final year of study. The College, therefore, anticipates that significant program changes will develop during the next decade due to external mandates and internal initiatives.
Through its approval processes, the Curriculum Committee, which has faculty, administrator, and student members, facilitates orderly undergraduate curriculum development at the College. The Curriculum Committee receives from the All-College Committee "any recommendations submitted by any Department Chair or by any member of the College community" and "after consultation with any appropriate department or departments" sends "reports and recommendations with respect to the general coordination and improvement of the College’s academic program" to the Academic Vice President. Since 1997 the core curriculum has been the subject of discussion and review; and in May 1999, the Curriculum Committee stated that while the process of reviewing the core curriculum was "not yet complete our preliminary findings show that the general structure of our core curriculum/general education sequence is robust and compares favorably with similar long standing sequences at other colleges, both regionally and nationally." In addition, during the past several years, the College Curriculum Committee has approved significant program introductions, revisions, and deletions. The notable program introductions include a new degree program, a B. A. in Spanish with concentrations in Literature, Pedagogy, Professional (1998-99), and several new concentrations--in Journalism within the English program (1996-97), in Interactive Multi Media within the Art program (1996-97), in Cultural Diversity within the Sociology program (1996-97), in International Business within Business (1997-98) and in Aquaculture within Biology (1997-98). New minor programs were introduced in Music (1997-98) and Educational Studies (1998-99). The Office Administration major was phased out in 1996-97 and minors in the Administrative Services and Business Teacher Education in Business Education were deleted in 1997-98; the Pre-Engineering Program was deleted in 1998-99.
While the deliberations of the Curriculum Committee in approving these program introductions and deletions were important, its role in reviewing and appraising curriculum revision proposals was even more engaging. Some curricular revisions emanated from the need to meet external agencies' accreditation standards and others from departmental faculty’s responses to disciplinary changes. Among the former were the approval of a revised Physical Education concentration (1997-98) and of extensive changes in the Theatre B.A. and B.F.A. programs (1997-98). There were also changes in the Art Teacher Education program (1997-98), the Education clusters of the Geography and Music programs (1997-98),and in the Chemistry major (1997-98). Among the latter were extensive revision of the Communications major courses (1996-97), the Computer Science major courses (1997-98), the Economics major (1997-98), the Political Science major (1998-99), the Latin American Studies minor (1998-99), the Urban Studies minor (1998-99), the Philosophy minor (1998-99), and the Women’s Studies minor (1998-99).
In the past several years the Curriculum Committee also has been a forum for deliberating policies relating to academic programs. For example, in 1997-98, the Committee initiated a review of the core curriculum which is on-going and approved the College mission statement, while determining that the Basic Algebra course (Mathematics 104N) was a remedial course that would count towards enrollment status but not towards graduation credit.
Recently the Curriculum Committee also has responded directly to the Board of Higher Education's "Rule of 5" initiative. This policy "used only one criteria, whether an average of five students graduated from a degree program per year for three consecutive years, to evaluate and eliminate programs." When the Board reviewed the Chemistry and Economics major programs using this criterion in 1997-98, the Curriculum Committee approved a statement in support of maintaining the Chemistry and Economics majors. In 1999-2000, the Committee met only once to adopt unanimously a statement opposing the "Rule of Five" as "unnecessary, arbitrary, and academically indefensible."
In 1999-2000, MSCA contractual issues prevented the Curriculum Committee from meeting except to approve the "Rule of 5" statement. During the year, changes in School of Education courses and Occupational Therapy courses have been approved by academic departments, the Academic Vice President and President to meet accreditation deadlines. While this administrative approval process enables essential curriculum initiatives to continue, it inhibits the vitality of on-going curriculum development, which requires faculty participation.
Various academic programs at the College are accredited by external agencies. Accreditation review processes have enhanced several undergraduate programs at the College in recent years. The Athletic Training Program received initial accreditation in 1997 from the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs with commendation for its faculty and affiliated clinical instructors and with a request for a plan to include more medical and allied health personnel in the program. The Chemistry department is seeking to remove probationary status and re-achieve full compliance with American Chemistry Society professional training standards. The department has begun to implement a plan to strengthen its curriculum, enhance the disciplinary competencies of its faculty, increase its enrollment, and upgrade its equipment with the expectation that the program will be fully compliant in 2001. In 1999, the National Association of Schools of Theatre granted Associate Membership to the Theatre Arts B. A. and B.F.A. programs, noting the need to enhance the facilities for these programs and for long-term planning.
The National Council for Accreditation for Teacher Education (NCATE) evaluation of the School of Education Unit, completed in November 1995, also was extremely positive. Out of 20 established NCATE standards, there was only one which was not met; this related to the lack of a clear entrance process for students into the College’s certification programs. Since this visit, the School of Education has addressed this deficiency and a formal procedure for admission to Certification Programs has been established. Many strengths were cited, including a strong conceptual framework, complete and well-written folios, a wide range of excellent field experiences, strong collaboration with area schools, and a well qualified faculty.
The Occupational Therapy Program underwent an initial accreditation review of its application for Developing Program Status. The program received full approval as well as positive feedback on the College’s resources, innovative scheduling and integration of research into the curriculum. There was concern related to the department chairperson’s lack of teaching experience and some budgetary issues regarding equipment, travel, and library resources. A plan to address these issues has been developed and is being implemented.
The reviews by specialized accrediting bodies during the past five years have been successful, with the exception of the AACSB accreditation for the School of Business. Nevertheless, the School of Business has made significant advances in implementing its curriculum revision based on student surveys and strategic planning. The School of Business Strategic Action Plans clearly delineate the linkage between action and resources within a two-year time frame. The undergraduate Business program has been strengthened significantly since the last NEASC accreditation visit.
The College is moving to models of performance-based assessment. The School of Nursing and School of Education are incorporating outcome measures in their programs. For the new millennium, most accrediting bodies are requiring institutions to plan for performance-based evaluation systems, which include both internal and external sources of evidence to demonstrate quality and effectiveness. Already many curricula are building outcomes assessment mechanisms into their programs of study, such as the Spanish baccalaureate program that compares entry level and senior level skills and the English Composition Assessment Project that has resulted in course changes in that essential general education program.
|